Cart

Your cart is empty

What is Heat Readiness? Moving from Reaction to Prevention

Heat safety in sports has long been approached reactively—monitoring environmental conditions, watching for symptoms, and responding when problems arise. But this reactive approach has significant limitations. Environmental metrics like WBGT and heat index provide valuable context about ambient conditions, but they don't account for individual variation in how athletes respond to heat. By the time visible symptoms appear, performance has already declined and risk has escalated.

Heat Readiness represents a fundamental shift in how we approach heat in athletics. It's a proactive, comprehensive framework that treats heat as a core performance and safety variable—not an afterthought. Heat Readiness encompasses acclimation protocols, individualized hydration strategies, risk screening, real-time monitoring, and data-driven decision making. The goal isn't just to avoid heat illness; it's to optimize athletic performance and safety by understanding and managing each athlete's response to heat stress.

In this comprehensive guide, you'll learn what Heat Readiness means, why it matters for your athletes, and how to build a proactive approach that transforms heat from a hazard into a manageable—even advantageous—variable in athletic performance.

Ready to move beyond environmental monitoring? HeatSense provides real-time, individualized core body temperature monitoring that turns Heat Readiness from concept to reality.

Explore how HeatSense works →

The Problem with Traditional Heat Management

For decades, heat management in sports has relied on a reactive model: monitor the weather, follow general guidelines, watch for warning signs, and respond when athletes show symptoms. While this approach has undoubtedly prevented some heat illnesses, it has fundamental limitations that leave athletes at risk and coaches making decisions without complete information.

Environmental Monitoring Only Tells Part of the Story

Current heat safety protocols typically center on environmental metrics—WBGT (Wet Bulb Globe Temperature), heat index, or ambient temperature. These measurements are valuable for understanding the conditions athletes will face, but they can't predict how individual athletes will respond to those conditions.

Two athletes practicing in the same 90°F environment can have vastly different physiological responses based on their acclimation status, hydration level, body composition, fitness level, recent illness, sleep quality, and numerous other factors. Environmental metrics like WBGT and heat index provide the context, but not the complete picture.

This limitation becomes especially problematic when environmental conditions fall into "moderate risk" zones where practice modifications are recommended but not required. Coaches must make judgment calls without knowing which athletes are actually struggling and which are handling the heat well. The result is often overly conservative decisions that limit training effectiveness, or worse, athletes pushing through unrecognized heat stress.

The Reactive Approach: Waiting for Symptoms

Traditional heat management relies heavily on symptom recognition—watching for signs like excessive fatigue, confusion, nausea, or decreased coordination. Coaches and athletic trainers are trained to identify these warning signs and respond appropriately, which is critical for emergency situations.

However, by the time symptoms become visible, significant physiological stress has already occurred. Core body temperature can rise to dangerous levels well before external signs are apparent. Performance degradation begins even earlier, as heat stress affects reaction time, decision-making, and physical output before an athlete "looks" overheated.

This reactive model also places enormous pressure on coaching staff to recognize subtle changes in potentially dozens of athletes simultaneously during fast-paced practices or competitions. Even the most attentive coach can miss early warning signs, especially in athletes who push through discomfort or mask their struggles.

One-Size-Fits-All Guidelines Don't Account for Individual Variation

Most heat safety protocols operate on a one-size-fits-all model: when environmental conditions reach certain thresholds, specific modifications apply to the entire team. Practice might be shortened, intensity reduced, or additional breaks mandated based solely on the thermometer reading.

While these precautions are well-intentioned, they don't reflect the reality that athletes respond to heat differently. A well-acclimated athlete in excellent cardiovascular condition might be performing optimally in conditions where a poorly acclimated teammate is approaching dangerous heat stress levels. Conversely, overly conservative modifications based on environmental data alone might unnecessarily limit training for athletes who are handling the heat well.

This approach also creates a binary decision-making framework—proceed or don't proceed—when the reality of heat management exists on a spectrum. What if some athletes could continue while others need breaks? What if intensity could be individualized based on actual physiological response rather than estimated risk?

The Cost of Reactive Heat Management

The limitations of reactive heat management carry real consequences:

Safety risks: Despite improved protocols, heat-related incidents continue to occur in athletics at all levels. When detection relies on visible symptoms, some athletes slip through the cracks.

Performance impact: Heat stress degrades athletic performance well before it becomes a safety issue. Athletes training in heat without adequate monitoring may be consistently underperforming without understanding why.

Legal and liability concerns: Schools and athletic programs face increasing legal and insurance implications when heat incidents occur, especially if protocols relied solely on environmental monitoring without assessing individual athlete responses.

Inefficient training: Blanket modifications based on environmental conditions alone can unnecessarily limit effective training sessions, particularly for well-prepared athletes who could safely handle more intensity.

The reactive model isn't entirely wrong—environmental monitoring and symptom recognition remain important. But they're insufficient for comprehensive heat management in modern athletics. We can do better.

Defining Heat Readiness

Heat Readiness is a comprehensive, proactive approach to managing heat as a core variable in athletic performance and safety. Rather than simply reacting to environmental conditions or waiting for symptoms to appear, Heat Readiness treats heat as a fundamental factor that must be actively monitored, managed, and optimized—much like training load, nutrition, or recovery.

At its foundation, Heat Readiness recognizes a crucial truth: heat is not just a hazard to avoid, but a performance variable to understand and manage. When approached proactively with the right data, heat becomes manageable and even advantageous as athletes and programs gain insights that competitors lack.

What Is Heat Readiness?

Heat Readiness is the measurable state of an athlete's physiological preparedness to safely perform in heat stress conditions, supported by proactive protocols and individualized data.

It encompasses three interconnected components:

1. Prevention: Implementing proactive protocols—acclimation, hydration strategies, screening, and preparation—before heat exposure occurs.

2. Monitoring: Measuring individual physiological responses to heat in real-time, providing objective data about how each athlete is actually handling heat stress.

3. Response: Making informed, data-driven decisions about training modifications, interventions, and athlete management based on individual readiness rather than general guidelines alone.

Unlike traditional heat safety, which asks "Are conditions safe enough to practice?", Heat Readiness asks "How is each athlete responding to these conditions, and how can we optimize their performance and safety?"

The Heat Readiness Framework

Heat Readiness shifts athletic programs from reactive to proactive on multiple dimensions:

Individual vs. Environmental Data

Traditional approach: Monitor WBGT and apply blanket modifications when thresholds are reached.

Heat Readiness approach: Monitor environmental conditions AND individual physiological responses. Understand that core body temperature varies significantly between athletes even in identical conditions.

Proactive vs. Reactive Protocols

Traditional approach: Wait for symptoms or environmental red flags before taking action.

Heat Readiness approach: Implement acclimation protocols, establish individualized hydration strategies, conduct pre-season screening, and monitor continuously to prevent problems before they occur.

Data-Driven vs. Assumption-Based Decisions

Traditional approach: Make decisions based on environmental estimates, general guidelines, and visual observation.

Heat Readiness approach: Make decisions based on objective physiological data combined with environmental context and individual athlete history.

Performance Optimization vs. Risk Avoidance

Traditional approach: Focus primarily on preventing the worst outcomes—heat illness and death.

Heat Readiness approach: Prevent heat illness while also optimizing training effectiveness and athletic performance in heat conditions.

Why "Readiness" Matters

The term "readiness" is deliberate. It implies preparation, capability, and optimization—not just survival. Military and aviation industries have long used readiness frameworks to ensure personnel can perform effectively under stress. Athletics is adopting this same mindset for heat.

Heat Readiness acknowledges that the goal isn't to avoid heat—it's to be ready for it. Athletes will compete in hot conditions. They will practice in heat. The question isn't whether they'll face heat stress, but whether they'll be prepared to handle it safely and effectively.

This reframing has profound implications:

  1. From fear to empowerment: Instead of viewing hot conditions with anxiety, well-prepared athletes and coaches can approach them with confidence, knowing they have the data and protocols to perform safely.
  2. From restrictions to optimization: Rather than limiting all athletes based on worst-case scenarios, Heat Readiness allows for individualized training that optimizes each athlete's adaptation to heat.
  3. From reactive to proactive: Instead of waiting to respond to problems, Heat Readiness programs prevent problems through preparation and continuous monitoring.

Heat Readiness vs. Heat Safety

It's worth distinguishing Heat Readiness from traditional heat safety:

Heat Safety typically refers to:

  • Emergency response protocols
  • Recognition and treatment of heat illness
  • Environmental monitoring guidelines
  • Blanket modifications based on conditions
  • Reactive interventions when problems occur

Heat Readiness includes heat safety but expands to:

  • Proactive prevention protocols
  • Individual athlete monitoring and optimization
  • Performance enhancement through heat adaptation
  • Data-driven personalization
  • Continuous improvement through measurement

Heat Safety is the baseline—the minimum necessary to avoid catastrophic outcomes. Heat Readiness is the comprehensive approach that treats heat as a core variable to manage, building on safety fundamentals while pursuing performance optimization.

Both are essential. Heat Safety provides the foundation; Heat Readiness builds the structure.

The Four Pillars of Heat Readiness

A comprehensive Heat Readiness program rests on four interconnected pillars. Each pillar addresses a critical aspect of preparing athletes for heat stress, and together they create a proactive framework for managing heat as a core performance variable.

Pillar 1: Acclimation

Heat acclimation—the physiological adaptations that occur with repeated heat exposure—is perhaps the most powerful tool in Heat Readiness. Properly acclimated athletes can safely handle significantly greater heat stress than unacclimated athletes in the same conditions.

What happens during acclimation:

When athletes are progressively exposed to heat stress, their bodies undergo remarkable adaptations. Heat strain mechanisms trigger physiological changes that improve thermoregulation: plasma volume expands, sweating begins earlier and becomes more efficient, heart rate decreases at equivalent workloads, and core body temperature rises more slowly during exercise.

These adaptations don't happen overnight. Meaningful acclimation typically requires 10-14 days of heat exposure, with the most significant changes occurring in the first week. However, adaptation rates vary considerably between individuals based on fitness level, previous heat exposure, genetics, and other factors.

Why individualized acclimation monitoring matters:

Traditional acclimation protocols assume all athletes adapt on the same timeline. A team might follow a state-mandated "5-day acclimation period" with prescribed increases in practice duration and intensity. While better than no acclimation protocol, this approach doesn't account for individual variation.

Some athletes acclimate quickly and could safely handle more intensity sooner. Others acclimate slowly and may need extended protocols. Without individual monitoring, coaches can't identify which athletes are truly ready for increased intensity and which need more time.

Heat Readiness treats acclimation as an individualized, measurable process rather than a checkbox to complete. By monitoring how each athlete's body responds to progressive heat exposure, coaches can optimize acclimation protocols for safety and training effectiveness.

Key acclimation considerations in Heat Readiness:

  • Progressive heat exposure protocols tailored to individual response
  • Monitoring acclimation status through physiological data
  • Accounting for lost acclimation after breaks or illness
  • Sport-specific acclimation needs based on intensity and duration
  • Seasonal timing for pre-season acclimation

Pillar 2: Hydration

Proper hydration is fundamental to thermoregulation and athletic performance, yet it's often oversimplified into generic advice like "drink 8 glasses of water" or "drink until urine is clear." Heat Readiness recognizes that hydration needs are highly individualized and must be managed proactively.

Individual variation in hydration needs:

Athletes have vastly different sweat rates depending on body size, fitness level, genetics, acclimation status, and intensity of activity. A 250-pound football lineman in full pads might lose 2-3 liters of fluid per hour in hot conditions, while a 130-pound distance runner might lose less than 1 liter per hour.

Electrolyte balance is particularly critical for growing athletes, as sodium loss through sweat must be replaced to maintain proper physiological function. One-size-fits-all hydration protocols can lead to under-hydration in some athletes and over-hydration in others—both of which impair performance and can create health risks.

Proactive hydration strategy:

Heat Readiness approaches hydration as a three-phase process:

  1. Pre-hydration: Ensuring athletes begin activity in a well-hydrated state, which provides a buffer against fluid losses during exercise.
  2. During-activity hydration: Replacing fluid and electrolyte losses at appropriate intervals based on individual needs and environmental conditions.
  3. Recovery hydration: Restoring fluid balance after activity to optimize recovery and prepare for subsequent training.

Each phase requires individualized planning based on measured or estimated sweat rates, environmental conditions, and activity intensity.

Monitoring hydration status:

Traditional hydration assessment methods include urine color charts, body weight changes, and thirst perception. While useful, these methods provide delayed information—by the time urine darkens or significant weight loss occurs, performance has already been affected.

Heat Readiness programs combine traditional assessment with more sophisticated monitoring approaches that provide earlier indicators of hydration status and its impact on thermoregulation.

Key hydration considerations in Heat Readiness:

  • Individual sweat rate assessment
  • Sport and position-specific hydration protocols
  • Electrolyte replacement strategies
  • Hydration monitoring methods
  • Education for athletes on self-monitoring

Pillar 3: Screening & Risk Assessment

Not all athletes enter heat exposure with the same level of risk. Pre-existing conditions, recent illness, medications, previous heat illness, and other factors can significantly increase individual susceptibility to heat stress. Heat Readiness includes comprehensive screening to identify high-risk athletes and establish individualized baselines.

Pre-season heat screening:

Before heat exposure begins—ideally during pre-participation physical examinations—athletes should undergo screening that identifies risk factors:

  • Medical history: Previous heat illness, cardiovascular conditions, sickle cell trait, medications that affect thermoregulation, recent illness
  • Individual characteristics: Fitness level, body composition, age, acclimation history
  • Behavioral factors: Sleep quality, nutrition habits, supplement use
  • Baseline measurements: Resting vital signs, body weight, baseline physiological markers

This screening serves multiple purposes: identifying athletes who need modified protocols or closer monitoring, establishing individual baselines for comparison during heat exposure, and documenting due diligence for risk management and compliance.

Ongoing risk assessment:

Heat Readiness recognizes that risk is dynamic, not static. An athlete's heat risk on any given day depends on their screening profile plus current factors like recent illness, sleep deprivation, prior day's training load, current hydration status, and acclimation level.

Effective Heat Readiness programs conduct ongoing risk assessment, updating individual risk profiles as circumstances change and adjusting monitoring or protocols accordingly.

Documentation and compliance:

Comprehensive screening and risk assessment also serve important legal and regulatory compliance purposes. Documented protocols demonstrate that programs are taking reasonable precautions to protect athlete safety, which is increasingly important as state and organizational heat safety requirements evolve.

Key screening considerations in Heat Readiness:

  • Pre-season medical and risk screening
  • Individual baseline establishment
  • Ongoing risk factor monitoring
  • Medical clearance protocols after illness
  • Documentation systems for compliance

Pillar 4: Real-Time Monitoring & Response

The defining characteristic of Heat Readiness is the shift from estimated risk to measured response. While environmental monitoring, acclimation protocols, hydration strategies, and screening create a strong foundation, real-time monitoring of individual physiological response provides the critical data needed for truly proactive, individualized heat management.

The limitation of environmental metrics alone:

As discussed earlier, environmental conditions tell you what athletes will face, not how they're actually responding. WBGT and heat index provide valuable context, but the same environmental conditions produce vastly different physiological responses across individual athletes.

This is where the other three pillars converge with monitoring: A well-acclimated, properly hydrated athlete with no risk factors might handle 95°F conditions with minimal stress. A poorly acclimated, inadequately hydrated athlete with elevated risk factors might struggle dangerously in 85°F conditions. Environmental data alone can't distinguish between these scenarios.

Why core body temperature is the gold standard:

Core body temperature is the most direct indicator of heat strain. Unlike external signs or environmental estimates, core temperature directly reflects how an athlete's thermoregulatory system is responding to heat stress.

When core temperature rises above certain thresholds—typically around 102-103°F (38.9-39.4°C) for exercise-related increases—physiological stress escalates rapidly. Performance degrades measurably even before reaching dangerous levels. By monitoring core temperature in real-time, coaches can identify when individual athletes are approaching critical thresholds and intervene proactively.

From data to decisions:

Real-time monitoring transforms decision-making from reactive to proactive:

  • Instead of waiting for visible symptoms, coaches can identify elevated heat stress early
  • Instead of applying blanket modifications, coaches can individualize interventions
  • Instead of guessing which athletes need breaks, coaches have objective data
  • Instead of uncertainty, coaches have confidence in their heat management decisions

This doesn't mean eliminating coaching judgment—it means augmenting judgment with objective data. Coaches still use their expertise and knowledge of individual athletes, but now they have physiological information to inform those decisions.

Practical implementation:

Effective real-time monitoring in Heat Readiness requires:

  • Accurate measurement: Technology that provides reliable individual physiological data
  • Actionable thresholds: Clear guidelines for when interventions are needed
  • Efficient workflow: Systems that integrate into practice routines without excessive disruption
  • Coach training: Education on interpreting data and making informed decisions
  • Athlete buy-in: Communication that helps athletes understand and embrace monitoring

Programs like those that have implemented HeatSense monitoring demonstrate that real-time data can be seamlessly integrated into athletic operations, providing coaches with actionable insights during practices and competitions.

Key monitoring considerations in Heat Readiness:

  • Individual core body temperature monitoring
  • Defined intervention thresholds
  • Real-time alert systems
  • Integration with existing practice protocols
  • Data tracking for continuous improvement

How HeatSense Enables Heat Readiness

The concept of Heat Readiness has existed in theory for years, but practical implementation has been limited by technology constraints. How do you monitor individual core body temperature on dozens of athletes simultaneously during dynamic practices? How do you translate that data into actionable decisions in real-time? How do you make the system practical and affordable for high schools, not just professional teams?

This is where HeatSense bridges the gap between concept and reality.

The Challenge: Making Individual Monitoring Practical

Traditional core body temperature measurement methods—rectal thermometers, ingestible pills, or invasive sensors—are accurate but impractical for routine athletic monitoring. Coaches need systems that are non-invasive, continuous, real-time, accurate, scalable to entire teams, and integrated into workflow without excessive disruption.

Surface-based wearables like heart rate monitors provide some useful data, but heart rate alone doesn't directly indicate heat strain—it's affected by intensity, fitness level, and numerous other factors beyond thermoregulation. Environmental sensors provide context but not individual response.

The missing piece has been a practical way to measure what matters most: how each athlete's body is actually responding to heat stress.

Individual Core Body Temperature Monitoring

HeatSense provides continuous, non-invasive core body temperature monitoring for individual athletes during activity. The system translates this physiological data into actionable insights for coaches:

  • Individual thresholds: Rather than generic cutoffs, HeatSense accounts for individual baselines and response patterns
  • Real-time alerts: Coaches receive notifications when athletes approach elevated heat stress levels
  • Historical tracking: Data accumulates over time, showing acclimation progress and identifying trends
  • Decision support: The system helps translate data into specific interventions—who needs breaks, who can continue, when modifications are needed

This individualized approach transforms the four pillars of Heat Readiness from theoretical concepts into practical protocols.

Real-World Application

Consider a typical August football practice scenario:

Without Heat Readiness (traditional approach):

  • Coach checks WBGT: 87°F—"yellow flag" conditions
  • Practice is shortened and modified for entire team
  • One athlete struggles visibly and is pulled out
  • Coach wonders if modifications were too conservative for some players or not conservative enough for others
  • Decisions based on environmental data, visual observation, and uncertainty

With Heat Readiness (HeatSense approach):

  • Coach checks WBGT: 87°F—provides environmental context
  • HeatSense monitors each athlete's individual core body temperature, providing real-time data
  • Data shows most athletes are handling conditions well
  • Two athletes show elevated heat responses despite similar external appearance
  • Coach receives data-driven alerts for those two athletes
  • Coach intervenes with hydration breaks and cooling based on the data
  • Other athletes continue productive training
  • Data logged for tracking acclimation progress
  • Coaches make informed decisions based on objective individual data plus environmental context

The difference is profound: instead of blanket restrictions or missed warning signs, Heat Readiness enables individualized, proactive management based on actual physiological response.

Beyond Monitoring: Comprehensive Heat Readiness

While real-time monitoring is the most visible component of HeatSense, the system supports all four pillars of Heat Readiness:

Acclimation: Track individual acclimation progress quantitatively, identifying athletes who are adapting as expected and those who need modified protocols.

Hydration: See how hydration strategies affect individual heat response, refining protocols based on measured outcomes.

Screening: Establish individual baselines during pre-season screening, providing comparison points for ongoing monitoring.

Monitoring & Response: Receive real-time data and alerts that enable proactive intervention before problems escalate.

This integrated approach transforms Heat Readiness from a collection of separate protocols into a cohesive system where each component reinforces the others.

Building a Heat Readiness Culture

Technology and protocols are essential, but Heat Readiness ultimately requires a cultural shift—moving from reactive emergency management to proactive performance optimization. This transformation happens at multiple levels within an athletic program.

From Emergency Response to Prevention Mindset

Traditional heat safety culture often centers on emergency response: "What do we do if someone has heat stroke?" This question is important, but it reflects reactive thinking.

Heat Readiness culture asks different questions: "How do we ensure no one reaches heat stroke levels?" and "How do we optimize each athlete's heat adaptation?" The shift from managing emergencies to preventing them represents a fundamental change in how programs approach heat.

This doesn't mean eliminating emergency protocols—those remain essential backup systems. But the primary focus shifts to prevention through preparation, monitoring, and proactive intervention.

Coach Buy-In and Education

Coaches are the front-line implementers of Heat Readiness. Their buy-in is critical for success. This requires:

Understanding the "why": Coaches need to understand why individual monitoring provides value beyond environmental metrics and visual observation. Education about heat physiology, individual variation, and performance impacts helps build this foundation.

Confidence in the "how": Coaches must trust the data they're receiving and understand how to act on it. Training on interpreting alerts, making intervention decisions, and integrating monitoring into practice routines builds operational confidence.

Seeing the benefits: When coaches experience Heat Readiness in action—catching elevated heat stress before visible symptoms, optimizing training for well-adapted athletes, making confident decisions—they become advocates for the approach.

Successful Heat Readiness implementation typically includes comprehensive coach education and ongoing support as programs establish their protocols.

Athlete Empowerment

Heat Readiness works best when athletes are active participants rather than passive subjects. This means:

Education: Athletes should understand heat physiology basics, why monitoring matters, and how Heat Readiness supports their performance and safety.

Transparency: When appropriate, sharing data with athletes helps them understand their own heat responses and take ownership of hydration, recovery, and communication with coaching staff.

Self-advocacy: Athletes should feel empowered to communicate about heat-related concerns without fear of being seen as weak or losing playing time. Heat Readiness data provides objective validation for athletes who are genuinely struggling.

Programs that cultivate athlete buy-in often see better protocol compliance and more open communication about heat-related issues.

Parent Communication and Trust

Parents—particularly of younger athletes—are understandably concerned about heat safety. Many families have been affected by heat-related tragedies and want assurance that their athletes are protected.

Heat Readiness programs build parent trust through:

Transparency: Communicating what protocols are in place and how the program monitors athlete safety Education: Helping parents understand Heat Readiness principles and their athlete's individual profile Data sharing: When appropriate, providing parents with information about their athlete's heat response and acclimation progress Responsiveness: Addressing parent concerns with data-informed explanations rather than generic assurances

This transparency transforms parent relationships from potential adversarial ("Are you keeping my child safe?") to collaborative ("We're partners in optimizing my child's athletic experience").

Making Readiness the Standard

Heat Readiness represents the future of heat management in athletics. As technology becomes more accessible and awareness grows, proactive, individualized approaches will become the standard of care rather than the exception.

This evolution is already underway. Regulatory frameworks are evolving to reflect understanding that environmental monitoring alone is insufficient. Liability considerations increasingly favor programs that demonstrate comprehensive, individualized heat management. Competitive advantages accrue to programs that optimize athlete adaptation to heat.

Forward-thinking athletic directors, coaches, and administrators are positioning their programs at the forefront of this shift, establishing Heat Readiness as their standard approach to heat management.

Conclusion

Heat Readiness represents a fundamental evolution in how athletics approaches heat management—from reactive to proactive, from generic to individualized, from guessing to knowing. By treating heat as a core performance variable rather than just a hazard to avoid, Heat Readiness enables programs to optimize both safety and athletic performance.

The four pillars—acclimation, hydration, screening, and real-time monitoring—provide a comprehensive framework for managing heat at every stage. When implemented together, they transform heat from an unpredictable threat into a manageable variable that programs can address with confidence and precision.

Technology like HeatSense makes this vision practical, providing the individual physiological data that enables truly proactive heat management. But technology alone isn't sufficient—Heat Readiness requires cultural commitment to prevention, education, and continuous improvement.

The stakes are high. Heat-related incidents continue to occur in athletics despite improved awareness. Performance is compromised when heat goes unmanaged. Legal and liability risks grow as expectations for comprehensive athlete safety increase. The reactive approaches of the past are no longer adequate for the challenges of the present.

Whether you're an athletic director evaluating solutions, a coach looking to improve your heat protocols, a parent advocating for better athlete safety, or an athletic trainer seeking more effective tools, Heat Readiness provides a path forward. The shift is already underway in forward-thinking programs. The question is not whether Heat Readiness will become standard practice, but when—and whether your program will be leading this evolution or catching up later.

Need help?

Frequently Asked Questions